The Greatest LPs of All-Time . . . kind of.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

We're not talking about the, say, My Aim Is True, which was the starting gun on a long and inspired career. We're not talking about the Nevermind, which was a perfectly-timed, but hugely derivative, LP that defined a generation. We're not talking about a You're Living All Over Me or a Diary, which appealed, despite their greatness, to a small group of particularly discerning fans--and still do. We're not even talking an Exile on Main St. or a Led Zeppelin IV, which stand out as a distinct highpoint in a long career of vast influence on popular music overall.

The Life Pursuit -- Belle & Sebastian
London Calling -- The Clash
The Soft Bulletin -- Flaming Lips
OK Computer -- Radiohead
Pet Sounds -- The Beach Boys

Something about these LPs--and I have no doubt there are many others, too--connects them. They are the best work the bands have done (obviously that is debatable, but I have a suspicion that if I checked sales numbers, they're at least the best-sellers*), and they seemed to come from nowhere. Example: The Flaming Lips were, despite renown on the college radio scene, essentially a psychedelic punk band known as much for their strangeness and inability to cross over as for their sound. Their biggest hit before 1999 was "She Don't Use Jelly." In fact, it remains their only hit in the States. But in 1999, they released The Soft Bulletin. Many longtime fans (including myself) were surprised (and, yeah, disappointed) by the drastic change in their sound. We eventually came around--or most of us did. But more importantly, the Lips were suddenly critics' darlings. They were all over the Mtv. The Soft Bulletin was called the third best album of 1990s by Pitchfork, and the best album of 1999 by NME.

Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots followed for the Lips. In my opinion, it is an uninspired follow-up to The Soft Bulletin. It's a good record, sure, but I'd rather listen to--I don't know--Clouds Taste Metallic or Hit to Death in the Future Head. It doesn't hold up to repeated listenings, and no one was talking about it as a groundbreaking, career-changing release.

Radiohead's OK Computer. Where the hell did that come from? Seriously, did anyone expect that after the tepid Pablo Honey, "Creep"'s success notwithstanding? The Bends was a stronger record, I suppose, but Radiohead was--to me--another mopey group of Brits, one of whom (lead singer Thom Yorke) looked an awful lot like Martin Short doing a mopey Brit. Then one morning in 1997, getting ready for work with Mtv on, I caught a new video but missed the opening credit. I didn't move from the couch till it ended. It was "Paranoid Android." (Not an embeddable clip, but worth clicking over if you haven't seen this video.)

OK Computer was a daring and brilliant record. Radiohead found fans they never had before, in the public and the press. It made nearly every best-of-the-year list, in the US and the UK, and won a Grammy. (I kind of get a kick out of how much Robert Christgau of the Village Voice didn't like it. Scroll down to Dud of the Month.) But the point: this was a daring, sparse, experimental, unfamiliar album. No one outside of the band's inner circle could have predicted this musical shift. But there it is, and it's brilliant, and everything since for Radiohead doesn't come close. Sure, the Kid A lovers exist (I'm not among them), and they continue to sell LPs and fill halls, but they never again saw a career-exploding popular and critical success like OK Computer.

I am not a Clash fan. I am a huge fan, though, of London Calling. In 1979, these guys recorded an album that explored ska, reggae, punk, rockabilly, and good old rock 'n' roll. It turned out to be the breakthrough they'd been looking for in the US, and went on to appear on not just the best-of-the-year lists by many rags, and not just best-of-the-decade (often making best of the '70s and best of the '80s list, despite being release in 1979), but best of all-time lists. Rolling Stone called it the eighth best record ever. They never had the same success again. They never pleased the critics or the public in the same way. Of course, hardcore Clash fans exist in great numbers, and they swallow up the discography like delicious foodstuff. But for most music fans, I think, London Calling is as deep into that discography as we need to get.

I won't go into detail on The Life Pursuit, except to say that B&S fans who have been around since Tigermilk will tell you that simply everyone who never much cared for B&S adored The Life Pursuit. Well, they've put out their follow-up, and it's . . . good. But I'm not listening to it repeatedly.

Or Pet Sounds. You want a WTF moment? I can only imagine what happened when a bunch of Jan and Dean fans slipped this slab of wax on their Victrolas, maybe expecting to hear the ilk of "Surfin' USA" or "California Girls." This is the album Paul McCartney played for John Lennon--over and over and over--and that was after they'd already done Rubber Soul. Come on!

And Pet Sounds is a great place to stop, because it highlights well the problem with such records: what followed for Brian Wilson--the LP's mastermind--was a "lost" LP called Smile. It was simply never good enough, and it didn't see the light of day until 2004, nearly 40 years after Pet Sounds was released. And that's the only truth about all these LPs I can figure: every artist I've mentioned simply never did it again. They struck absolute greatness--created some of the best and best appreciated music of all time--and then slipped toward mediocrity once again.

Why? Is it the grasping for greatness, having touched it once, that makes it impossible to hold (like soap in the shower, if you will)? That's the best explanation I can give. Of course, what might be more valuable is an answer to this: How did they hit greatness to begin with? The bands above didn't give any indication that they'd someday create such start-to-finish masterpieces, albums I would, at a moment of weakness, even call flawless. But they did.

I guess if we had an answer to that, we'd all have framed platinum records hanging in our living rooms.

*I checked, and Yoshimi is gold, while Soft Bulletin is not. My best guess is that Yoshimi was released to a public suddenly familiar with the Flaming Lips. Also, "Do You Realize?" was frequently used in commercials.

Comments (18)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I know that this is closer to the /You're Living All Over Me/ & /Diary/ end of the spectrum, but the theme about not being able to re-achieve the excellence calls to mind (for me, what else?) Squeeze's /East Side Story/. Of course, it didn't come from nowhere: their previous two records were excellent. And while the sound of /ESS/ is more mature than it's predecessors, it's not a shocking break from those albums. But even so...

(1) Despite it's excellence, Squeeze's songwriting and production collapsed very quickly. The album after that, /Sweets from a Stranger/, was horrifically uninspired. To this day, I can't get my head around how such talented songwriters could just lose it overnight. They tried for another 17 years to claw their way back to musical greatness. They had some respectable albums, but nothing came close to /ESS/. and its two predecessors.

(2) Perhaps supporting your first hypothesis about the sales of /Yoshimi/, I was shocked to learn that /Sweets/ outsold /ESS/ by a pretty healthy margin.
1 reply · active 753 weeks ago
I was THISCLOSE to including East Side Story on this list, and only left it off for the reasons you mentioned.

If I were British, the list would look quite different, by the way. I'd have had to leave off the Clash entirely, who were quite popular before LC in the UK. And Squeeze? If my tiny bit of knowledge on the subject can be trusted, I believe they were being hailed as the next Lennon and McCartney before East Side Story was even out, right?
The Clash's triple album follow up to to London Calling (Sandanista!) supports your thesis. After nailing the piñata in one swing at their last birthday party, they went nuts and flailed like crazy at their next until parents had to intervene.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
A triple album. Doesn't that just say it all?
For a long time I could not dig Sandanista! at all. Like most people, I was introduced to it after I had heard London Calling, and it just did not give me what I wanted from the Clash. But with much more distance, I have warmed to the album. Obviously, it shouldn't be a triple album. But if you take the 10 or 12 best songs from Sandanista!, and try to forget that this is the same band that did LC, I think you have a really excellent album.

In hindsight, one of the things I respect about Sandinista! is that it makes absolutely no attempt to capture what was great about LC. (I guess this is also true of Radiohead's Kid A.) I take it as an admission that there was nothing more to do in that vein. If so, they were right to think so.

At any rate, the song "Corner Soul" competes in my tastes for the slot of favorite clash song. (I'm not trying to be contrarian, though: it's competing with conventional Clash picks like Clampdown, Spanish Bombs, Death or Glory, Tommy Gun, Career Opportunities, and the like.)
Cheap Trick "Live at Budokon." Begging the question*, which artists have one transcendent album which is also a live one? There are also a number of artists who have a great first album but never match it. The Bo Deans, The Wallflowers, Counting Crows. Well, all three of those had T Bone Burnett at the knobs, which must have something to do with it.

* Just said that to tweak Jodi.
4 replies · active 753 weeks ago
Cheap Trick, I loathe. I like "Surrender," but otherwise hate their entire output. Therefore, I will not discuss them further.

As to the others, I don't think there is a real critical and popular consensus that their debuts were, in fact, great. For example, one music journalist I know (ahem, me) thinks those albums stink. Heh. All kidding aside, they were certainly not groundbreaking, but fit perfectly and predictably into their eras.
I've hated music critics since I was a teenager. Always finding reasons to love some popular crap and hate on something else, then they change their minds ten years later and decide that the stuff they neglected is actually brilliant and the other stuff is boring. Usually they time it perfectly so whatever group it is has just ceased to be interesting. I call it the REM Principle.
I think that's fair enough, but since I was a music publicist for several years and journalist for 25 minutes, I will say this: remember that they are people too, simply people who think about music and music criticism constantly. They are often susceptible to or even reliant upon the whims of the industry overall, and I think some of the complaints you have about their changing minds are part of a larger cycle within the music business.
Allman Brothers Live at Fillmore. Lacking that album, I doubt we'd appreciate the full power of the band. In Memory of Elizabeth Reed is so good that it makes up for every commercial Gregg Allman has allowed to use Ramblin' Man and Midnight Rider.
What about the same thing for writers? Particularly prolific ones who turn out respectable and workmanlike efforts but fire on all cylinders for one book in particular. Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game and Avi's Crispin are hereby nominated.
1 reply · active 753 weeks ago
I considered trying to connect this to writers, but I had trouble coming up with examples. You have done so. Long live the comments section!
I am not so down on some of these follow-ups.

Radiohead still puts out albums that are much stronger than almost everything else out there. Thom Yorke has been a big downer ever since Kid A, though. I will admit, 30 seconds into OK Computer my mouth was agape. That never happens.

While I like Yoshimi much more than you appear to, I find any FL albums after it to be almost unlistenable. What a shame.

I do find it especially irritating when critics decide that because one album was life-changing, all of the albums that follow should be, as well. I like the fact that Radiohead and the Flaming lips completely changed direction after those albums. Most bands don't have the balls to do that.

It's a little more out there, but how about Marvin Gaye - What's going On?
3 replies · active 753 weeks ago
Of course personal opinion plays a role in this conversation, and to some degree maybe my appreciation for The Bends, or for the Lips' work before the Soften Bulletin, plays a part in my general distaste for the post-great-LP stuff? Especially the immediate stuff (Kid A and Yoshimi, that is).

I don't know Marvin's career nearly well enough to speak on that.
I think in some of these cases you're seeing bands going from pop to experimental (or vice-versa), and you're playing the part of Goldilocks.

I lean much more towards the experimental end of things. It's great when they can capture both pop and experimental in the same album, but I also appreciate when a song starts to really click on the 51st listen.

Re: Marvin - What's Going On was a complete departure from the music he had been making. I believe it was also a pretty successful album http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What's_Going_On
I see what you're saying, but I'm not sure I agree. Obviously, like I said, my subjective ideas about these bands and their work and music in general plays a role here, but I have not ignored the idea that the LPs I'm highlighting have meant a tremendous amount to the artists' careers and how they are perceived afterward by critics and the public. Of course, many artists move from pop to experimental, or certain degrees of each, and simply don't succeed to such heights. I don't think that's only my opinion.
It occurs to me that this post is a nice version of the "wouldn't it have been better if their tour bus had exploded immediately after _______" post.
1 reply · active 753 weeks ago
I was about to agree; but I do want to point out one very important difference (I think). In most of the cases that Steve mentions, the follow up albums don't retro-actively disgrace the band and ruin what had come earlier. In my view the winners of the "tour bus exploding" game go beyond mere disappointment into the realm of disgrace.

For me, the two biggest winners are: The Cure, right after Disintegration, and Weezer, right after Pinkerton. (Pinkerton has been completely ruined for me in the wake of the green album and beyond. It was on repeat in my car for months in the late 1990s. Since 2000, I've listened to it no more than five times).

Post a new comment

Comments by